118 Comments
User's avatar
Jean Jones's avatar

Okay then.... this is slightly* worrisome. Not that I don't believe this could happen, rather I can REALLY believe this has been happening.

My head hurts now😠😡

Will we EVER be free from that odious 🍊💩 gibbon and his minions?? E. T. T. D.

Expand full comment
AG's avatar

The reason he doesn’t keep company with wholesome, untouchables is because he cannot blackmail them.

Expand full comment
Jean Jones's avatar

Truth to THAT 😵‍💫😵‍💫

Expand full comment
Daniel Rench's avatar

Let the truth and the facts continue to shine light on this uncertain time

👏👏👏👏🇺🇸

Expand full comment
Patrick Daniels aka Cromulent1's avatar

Dubious, considering TPTB Jean!

Expand full comment
Bombay Troubadour's avatar

I want to go back to when Orwell’s ‘1984’ was fiction.

Expand full comment
Lisamanv's avatar

And Idiocracy was a movie not a documentary.

Expand full comment
C Leonard's avatar

Sooooo VALID

Expand full comment
Rusty Rollings's avatar

And does this mean there will be charges by the law for running illegal surveillance?

Expand full comment
Grant Stern's avatar

That remains an open possibility.

Expand full comment
P. J. Schuster's avatar

Grief I would hope so. No wonder the magas were so ripe for a cult, our govt has become so corrupted by money & power. To think that you can bribe a Supreme Court justice to the tune of over $4M & no one does anything about it.

Expand full comment
Patrick Daniels aka Cromulent1's avatar

The corruption falls in line with the usual Uber wealthy elites who run this country P. J. !

Expand full comment
Marcianna's avatar

I agree with you, P. J. I thought that AOC had submitted, was it a petition or other document to impeach and remove those SCOTUS Justices who have taken gifts (a/k/a BRIBES). The fact that Clarence Thomas would accept so much yet claim to be impartial while having made some very questionable decisions is an insult to citizens of this country. Who is over a Supreme Court? I’m hoping we are able to have the House and the Senate out of the hands of Trump’s MAGATS and maybe something may be accomplished by the next Congress.

What would it take to remove corrupt SCOTUS justices.

Expand full comment
serghiy's avatar

…EXACTLY !

Expand full comment
serghiy's avatar

…hahahahahahaha are you fucking serious ?! …our country as dumb as bag of fucking hammers !

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/feature/beer-hall-putsch-what-hitler-learnt

Expand full comment
MommaDoc's avatar

Wow. I didn’t know this.

Expand full comment
P. J. Schuster's avatar

Stop being so damned negative & dismissive of everyone. I agree with most of what you comment, but there’s no need to call everyone other than yourself, dumb. Many of us DO see the problem & are trying to do what we can to correct it. I’m not on board with an armed revolution.

Expand full comment
serghiy's avatar

…i’ll get back to you on that a few months from now

Expand full comment
serghiy's avatar

…are you for real ? …if you think you don’t deserve what’s on and what’s coming - you are one of the reasons, WE ARE THE SAME COUNTRY sharing same land and citizenship - WE ARE ALL RESPONSIBLE and if you offended by me calling americans stupid then you are hopeless and never learn anything

Expand full comment
MommaDoc's avatar

Come on. We all know how this works. He’s a bad, bad man and has done yet another really bad thing. Nothing to see here. Turn the page and move on.

I don’t understand why he gets away with crimes, always has. Grassley is my senator. He looks the other way.

Expand full comment
Evelyn Murphy's avatar

Trump’s not President yet.!!!!

Expand full comment
diane600's avatar

No, no one will be charged because the right wing propoganda machine will spin the story to their benefit.

Expand full comment
Evelyn Murphy's avatar

External operatives or retired ones, but they still used internal data, machines & methods, illegal for them still to use to do it.!!!

Expand full comment
Midi Drew's avatar

I am OK with whistleblowers. I just wish they would come forward sooner. It always feels as if it's just a little bit too late, you know?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 19
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Patrick Daniels aka Cromulent1's avatar

Half of them perhaps, the other half peerless in vacuous idiocy!

Expand full comment
Jeff Urdank's avatar

We’ll see how “good” they are at the poles. Just sayin’.

✊🇺🇸🌊😎

Expand full comment
AG's avatar

Sadly, this doesn’t surprise me, in fact Trump has operated this way his entire life. Everything Trump, hide, lie, project. Everyone else, including his colleagues, get as much dirt on them, any way possible to bend them to my will. Anything for “Orange Jesus”

Expand full comment
Ian Thomas's avatar

We’ve reached the point where we have essentially another watergate, but we’re all just like “yeah, that checks out.”

God help us.

Expand full comment
AG's avatar

I don’t take this election as anything that resembles a normal run of the mill election. Compared to watergate, it’s so much worse. During Watergate we had a justice system that wasn’t horribly corrupt as we have today. There were guardrails, the Republicans did the right thing and made Nixon resign. You won’t find a republican today that can make Trump do the right thing. When I say “it doesn’t surprise me” don’t mistake that for apathy. I am well aware these are dangerous times in America. Trump and his minions want violence whether they win or lose. Trump has demanded it. When a country falls it’s because the justice system will not stop the evil from holding power. I have no faith in our justice system. God help us is right.

Expand full comment
Ian Thomas's avatar

I understand you, but I would also point out that many Republican judges threw out their phony 2020 election lies. Many others have held our right to vote in hundreds of election law cases since then.

SCOTUS is corrupt and many others are as well, like the 5th circuit, but its not all completely gone.

Expand full comment
AG's avatar

It’s close, abortion is just one example. Trump should have been criminally investigated on January 7th. I blame Garland for that.

Expand full comment
Herbert Hoover's avatar

Garland wasn't AG until March 2021 because 30 Senators didn't want him, or any other AG to be appointed by Biden.

Expand full comment
AG's avatar

Point taken but I still think Garland should have appointed a special counsel the first day of his taking the position

Expand full comment
Ann's avatar

That was then though. Back when a few still choose to do the right thing. I'm not being cynical when I say this. I genuinely wonder how many aren't compromised by now. We're coming up on 5 years since then. Alot has happened and none of it good.

Expand full comment
Ian Thomas's avatar

To the contrary, if you check out Democracy Docket newsletter, they’ve been tracking all the voting laws and lawsuits. They have a running tally that shows we’ve won twice as many as we lost and the vast majority of the serious cases.

So far, the guardrails are holding. We do our part and trust them to do theirs (with a heavy dose of scrutiny). Otherwise, we’ve already lost. I have hope for building a better future. I think people are finally realizing how close we came to the worst case scenario.

Expand full comment
P. J. Schuster's avatar

Not me, I’m certain this is hair on fire time; but those that actually have power seem to not be doing anything

Expand full comment
Bonnie Tryonoviech's avatar

I knew the answer was yes before even reading the article, because Trump accused Obama and democrats of the same thing against him. Every accusation from him always is a confession.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Mate's avatar

Definitely projection in everything Trump and his cronies accuse their opponents. Now, they've gotten a true following of wannabes who think they'll be bestowed with wealth and power. Whoa, won't they be surprised!!!

Expand full comment
Kathy Darby's avatar

Holy sh*t

Expand full comment
Neal Rauhauser's avatar

I've been keeping a Maltego graph of MAGA world since this time in 2020. I'd start with reading on Phil Waldron, then pull threads from there. This is really two separate issues, too. The laptop is one sort of thing, the surveillance quite another.

Expand full comment
robin Robinette-Powell's avatar

If we ever needed Merrick Garland to step up to the plate it's now. If I'm not mistaken it's illegal for our government to do surveillance operations on American citizens unless it's for national security reasons. The CIA is not supposed to work within the US. This should be at the top of every news station, newspaper and on line media. But something tells me we won't hear a peep. Thank you for reporting this very important information

Expand full comment
Kimberly Carlson's avatar

Well well Not Surprised by this ruthless fn criminal everything he does is illegal!! And NOTHING HAPPENS TO HIM 😡😡 Tired Of This Mfr Getting Away With Everything 😡😡 DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!! There Needs To Be Consequences For This 😡 It’s Illegal AF 😡😡😡😡

Expand full comment
Lola Renda's avatar

Our “Intelligence Community” needs to get their shit together. Doesn’t anyone have a conscience anymore? Does an oath mean anything? Is it all about money! Why do I waste my time wondering? Don’t answer that.

Expand full comment
Michael Rapp's avatar

And you can be damn sure…there’s volumes of trumpery yet to be exposed!

Expand full comment
Kylie's avatar

This dude does stuff fifteen million times more problematic than Watergate but is still a viable candidate? What the heck, America?

Expand full comment
kittymomviv's avatar

"The private surveillance program was run by former or retired employees of the United States Intelligence Community." It sounds to me like these people would be the REAL Deep State, yes? People outside the government using government resources to gain access to info on current government officials? I hope and expect the Committee to make time for this whistleblower in a timely manner. Thank you for sharing, such that we may look for this hearing!

Expand full comment
Kay G's avatar

Why is this even a surprise? Donald Trump has been stating that he will seek revenge (I will be your retribution) if he wins the election. He has specifically named the individuals also named in this letter. Donald Trump is now telling the American public at his rallies about the “enemies from within”. Again - these individuals are some of his chief targets.

The letter is evidence of what Trumps people are doing to maintain surveillance on where his targets are located.

What is done about it will depend on the election and what happens afterwards.

Expand full comment
Jeanne Elbe's avatar

I think Serghiy may be a Russian troll. If you read his posts aloud you can hear the cadence and word placement is not how American English sounds. J/ S

Expand full comment
P. J. Schuster's avatar

I don’t think so, I’ve read many of their comments & I truly believe they’re trying to warn us, to grab us by the shoulders & shake us awake to the danger.

Expand full comment